Skip to main content
. 2021 May 20;44:102016. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2021.102016

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

A) Individual and mean-group electrically-evoked force responses to a 3-min fatigue protocol (WT: n = 7, CARNS1−/−: n = 10). No significant differences were shown between genotypes. (Mixed models: main effect of time: F (7, 9) = 38.21, p < 0.0001; main effect of genotype: F(1, 15) = 0.84, p = 0.37; genotype*time interaction: F(7, 9) = 1.15, p = 0.41. *p < 0.05 vs. the previous time point (within-group effects). B and C) Representative electrically-evoked maximal tetanic and single twitch contractions showing the similarities between WT and CARNS1−/− rats. D and E) Peak force (ES: −0.31) and time to peak (ES: −0.24) during electrically-evoked maximal tetanic contraction (WT: n = 7, CARNS1−/−: n = 10). F–H) Peak force (ES: −0.10), time to peak (ES: −0.27) and half-relaxation (ES: −0.68) time during electrically-evoked single twitch contraction (WT: n = 7, CARNS1−/−: n = 10). All p-values displayed in the dot plots refer to Welch two-sample t-tests.