Table 2.
First generation antiplaque agents | Second generation antiplaque agents | Third generation antiplaque agents |
---|---|---|
This may reduce the plaque to 20-50%. They have low mouth retention. |
The plaque decrease is about 70-90% overall and is better preserved than the first generation. They demonstrate improved oral tissue retention and slow release characteristics |
They block microorganisms’ binding on or against the tooth. In contrast to second generation chlorhexidine, they have low retention capability. |
E.g., Antibiotics, phenols, quaternary ammonium compounds and sanguanarine. | E.g.,. Bisbiguanides (chlorhexidine). | E.g., Delmopinol. |