Skip to main content
. 2021 May 12:1–5. doi: 10.1017/ice.2021.219

Table 4.

Comparing Employees Who Tested Positive for SARS-CoV-2 Against Other Employees Involved in a Significant Exposure During an AGP

Variable Significant Exposure During AGP and Tested Negative for SARS-CoV-2 (n=222), No. (%) Significant Exposure During AGP and Tested Positive for SARS-CoV-2 (n=3), No. (%) P Valuea
AGP involved in the exposure?b 222 (65.9) 3 (37.5) .13
Reason for significant exposure
  Any Lack of respirator during AGP 203 (91.4) 3 (100) 1
  Any lack of eye protection 26 (11.7) 2 (66.7) .04
Lack of respirator and eye protection during AGP 12 (5.4) 2 (66.7) .01

Note. AGP, aerosol-generating procedure.

a

The Student t test was used for continuous variables. The Fisher exact test was used for categorical variables.

b

Total with significant exposure and tested negative = 337; total with significant exposure and tested positive = 8 including exposures not involving an AGP.