Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 30;11(5):583. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11050583

Table 2.

LOOCV Test Metrics for “true-pathology” group comparisons.

ESI-Ion Trap MS
Group 1 vs. Group 2
Mean (SD)
Group 1
Mean (SD)
Group 2
“Effect
Size”
p Value N Group 1:Group 2 Sensitivity Specificity Figure#
moderate-Alzheimer’s disease vs. Control, N = 14 62.73% (7.34%) 28.07% (6.85%) 4.88 6.06 × 10−14 16:14 1 1 Figure 2A
mild-Alzheimer’s disease vs. Control, N = 14 63.67% (5.01%) 37.29% (5.86%) 4.83 4.24 × 10−13 15:14 1 1 Figure 2C
Alzheimer’s disease, N = 31 vs. Control, N = 14 49.81% (3.81%) 28.53% (3.50%) 5.81 3.63 × 10−14 31:14 1 1 Figure 3A and Figure 4A
mild-Alzheimer’s disease vs. moderate-Alzheimer’s disease 67.33% (4.92%) 42.66% (5.41%) 0.77 3.25 × 10−14 15:16 0.93 1 Figure 3C and Figure 4D
Training set: Alzheimer’s disease vs. Control 55.25% (3.15%) 20.09% (2.36%) 12.63 1.24 × 10−24 21:14 1 1 Figure 3B
mild and moderate-Alzheimer’s disease vs. TBI 64.12% (4.17%) 26.78% (6.13%) 7.12 1.53 × 10−14 18:13 1 1 Figure 4B
ESI-Single-Quad MS
Group 1 vs. Group 2
Mean (SD)
Group 1
Mean (SD)
Group 2
“effect
size”
p Value N Group 1:Group 2 Sensitivity Specificity Figure#
mild-Alzheimer’s diseasevs. Control, N = 14 66.67% (8.80%) 26.07% (12.74%) 3.70 4.58 × 10−10 15:14 1 1 Figure 5A
moderate-Alzheimer’s diseasevs. Control 73.14% (7.11%) 49.35% (11.36%) 2.51 5.12 × 10−7 16:14 0.93 0.86 Figure 5B
Alzheimer’s diseasevs. Control, N = 14 44.82% (8.92%) 27.91% (6.45%) 2.17 1.28 × 10−8 31:14 0.93 0.71 Figure 5C
moderate-Alzheimer’s disease vs. mild-Alzheimer’s disease 75.56% (8.35%) 39.42% (11.14%) 3.67 7.75 × 10−11 15:16 0.93 0.94 Figure 5D

Leave one out cross validation (LOOCV); mass spectrometer (MS); standard deviation (SD); effect size measured by Cohen’s d; p value measured by Student’s t-test; true negative (TN); false negative (FN).