Table 4.
Multiple linear regression results predicting egg intake, protein intake and adverse events after the 12 week intervention (T2) (n 100)*
| Regression model | Egg intake | Protein intake (total) | Protein intake (animal sources) | Adverse events | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R = 0·816, R 2 = 0·666, adjusted R 2 = 0·632, F(9, 89) = 19·709, and P < 0·001 | R = 0·778, R 2 = 0·605, adjusted R 2 = 0·570, F(8, 90) = 17·226, and P < 0·001 | R = 0·713, R 2 = 0·508, adjusted R 2 = 0·464, F(8, 90) = 11·609, and P < 0·001 | R = 0·600, R 2 = 0·360, adjusted R 2 = 0·295, F(9, 89) = 5·564, and P < 0·001 | |||||
| β | P | β | P | β | P | β | P | |
| Condition (intervention, control) | −0·013 | 0·84 | 0·071 | 0·29 | 0·095 | 0·21 | 0·051 | 0·56 |
| Age (years) | 0·013 | 0·84 | −0·031 | 0·67 | −0·019 | 0·81 | −0·097 | 0·29 |
| Gender (female, male) | 0·017 | 0·80 | 0·093 | 0·21 | 0·072 | 0·38 | −0·125 | 0·19 |
| Egg intake at T1 (eggs/month) | 0·685 | <0·01 | ||||||
| Protein intake (total) at T1 (g/d) | 0·749 | <0·01 | ||||||
| Protein intake (animal sources) at T1 (g/d) | 0·681 | <0·01 | ||||||
| Adverse events at T1 | 0·409 | <0·01 | ||||||
| Protein intake (total) at T2 (g/d) | 0·200 | <0·01 | 0·037 | 0·68 | ||||
| BMI atT2 (kg/m2) | 0·154 | 0·02 | −0·028 | 0·69 | 0·024 | 0·76 | 0·141 | 0·13 |
| Physical activity at T2 (kJ)† | −0·012 | 0·86 | −0·094 | 0·20 | −0·067 | 0·41 | 0·062 | 0·51 |
| HR QoL score at T2‡ | −0·098 | 0·15 | −0·088 | 0·22 | −0·110 | 0·17 | −0·192 | 0·05 |
| Previous participant (no, yes) | −0·019 | 0·79 | 0·109 | 0·13 | 0·065 | 0·43 | −0·043 | 0·65 |
HR QoL, health-related quality of life.
Significant co-efficients are in bold.
Physical activity was measured by the Community Healthy Activities Model Program for Seniors questionnaire.
HR QoL was measured by the SF-36 questionnaire.