Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 29;10(5):1062. doi: 10.3390/cells10051062

Table 1.

Comparisons of evolutionary rates of (a) length measures and (b) mass measures in ungulates. The model (a) compares length measures (i.e., horn/antler length, muzzle width and sperm head, midpiece and flagellum length), while model (b) compares mass measures (testes and body mass). Note that the two models assess different numbers of ungulate species. The observed (σ2obs) and common evolutionary rate (σ2common) are shown for each trait. Additionally, presented are the AIC values for the observed (AICobs) and common (AICcommon) model, log-likelihood values for the observed (Log(Lobs)) and common models (Log(Lcommon)), and the log-likelihood ratio tests (LRT) and associated p-values for comparisons between observed and constrained rate models. Log-likelihood values, LRTs, and p-values are further displayed for Post hoc pairwise comparisons.

Trait σ2obs σ2common AICobs AICcommon Log (Lobs) Log (Lcommon) LRT p
(a) Length Measure Comparisons (n = 38)
Horn/antler length 10.71 × 10−3 3.30 × 10−3 −245.97 −81.83 132.98 46.91 172.14 <0.001
Muzzle width 4.17 × 10−3
Sperm head length 0.56 × 10−3
Sperm midpiece length 0.87 × 10−3
Sperm flagellum length 0.20 × 10−3
Post hoc pairwise comparisons Head length vs. Midpiece length 77.96 77.05 1.81 0.18
Head length vs. Flagellum length 106.20 101.20 1.00 <0.01
Head length vs. Muzzle width 48.09 31.47 33.25 <0.001
Head length vs. Weapon length 30.15 −1.58 63.45 <0.001
Midpiece length vs. Flagellum length 97.88 88.23 19.30 <0.001
Midpiece length vs. Muzzle width 39.77 29.08 21.39 <0.001
Midpiece length vs. Weapon length 21.82 −2.60 48.85 <0.001
Flagellum length vs. Muzzle width 68.02 34.51 67.02 <0.001
Flagellum length vs. Weapon length 50.07 −0.34 100.81 <0.001
Muzzle width vs. Weapon length −8.04 −12.13 8.18 <0.01
(b) Mass Measure Comparisons (n = 60)
Testes mass 0.019 0.017 118.56 117.42 −55.28 −55.71 0.87 0.35
Body mass 0.015