Table 3.
Dietary daily intake expressed as % of energy (%E).
| Obese Clusters (G1) n = 65 |
MHO Cluster (G2) n = 11 |
Normoweight (G3) n = 118 |
Kruskal–Wallis H Test (p) | Post Hoc Pairwise Comparison (p) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Macronutrients | ||||||||||
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | G1:G2 | G1:G3 | G2:G3 | ||
| Calories (Kcal/day) | 2002.34 | 583.09 | 2320.70 | 371.52 | 2479.31 | 1811.90 | 0.09 | |||
| Proteins (%E) | 16.54 | 2.16 | 16.34 | 1.89 | 16.37 | 2.68 | 0.96 | |||
| Carbohydrates (%E) | 46.96 | 5.25 | 45.73 | 5.84 | 42.64 | 7.50 | 0.64 * | |||
| Simple sugars (%E) | 21.74 | 5.25 | 21.72 | 2.28 | 20.38 | 5.84 | 0.90 * | |||
| Lipids (%E) | 33.34 | 6.25 | 35.05 | 6.83 | 37.28 | 7.33 | 0.64 | |||
| Individual FA (% E) | ||||||||||
| C14:0 | 0.95 | 0.43 | 1.17 | 0.73 | 0.91 | 0.39 | 0.31 * | |||
| C16:0 | 6.07 | 1.21 | 6.58 | 1.74 | 5.93 | 1.18 | 0.17 | |||
| C18:0 | 2.32 | 0.56 | 2.49 | 0.83 | 2.33 | 0.58 | 0.62 * | |||
| Total SFA | 10.61 | 2.65 | 11.84 | 4.32 | 10.98 | 2.45 | 0.09 | |||
| C16:1 | 0.52 | 0.14 | 0.56 | 0.18 | 0.52 | 0.12 | 0.65 | |||
| C18:1 | 13.91 | 3.63 | 14.63 | 2.95 | 16.27 | 4.17 | 0.55 * | |||
| Total MUFA | 14.86 | 3.72 | 15.66 | 3.09 | 17.22 | 4.22 | 0.50 | |||
| C18:2 | 4.19 | 1.78 | 3.63 | 1.30 | 5.00 | 2.44 | 0.33 | |||
| C20:4 | 0.53 | 0.12 | 0.60 | 0.14 | 0.65 | 0.27 | 0.82 * | |||
| Total ω-6 | 4.23 | 1.78 | 3.68 | 1.33 | 5.07 | 2.46 | 0.37 | |||
| C18:3 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.25 | |||
| C20:5 (EPA) | 0.08 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.97 | |||
| C22:5 (DPA) | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.68 | |||
| 22:6 (DHA) | 0.15 | 0.10 | 0.14 | 0.08 | 0.15 | 0.09 | 0.96 | |||
| Total ω-3 | 0.78 | 0.22 | 0.82 | 0.24 | 0.90 | 0.33 | 0.46 | |||
| Total PUFA | 5.14 | 1.84 | 4.67 | 1.48 | 6.11 | 2.67 | 0.01 | 1.00 | 0.03 | 0.12 |
| ω6/ω3 | 5.70 | 2.34 | 4.57 | 1.19 | 6.00 | 3.20 | 0.05 | |||
Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Not normally distributed variables. Pairwise comparison conducted with a Bonferroni adjustment. * ANOVA was conducted instead of Kruskal–Wallis. Post hoc pairwise comparisons are only shown for cases with a significant difference between FA using ANOVAs or Kruskal–Wallis tests.