Table 2.
Poisson regression model for top 10 genera relative abundance based on breastfeeding practices one month.
| Breastfeeding Practices One Month | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genus | Rel.abund (%) | IRR | 95% CI | p | |
| Streptococcus | 29.19 | EBF vs. MF | 0.92 | 0.85–1.00 | 0.033 |
| Staphylococcus | 27.78 | EBF vs. MF | 0.69 | 0.64–0.74 | <0.001 |
| Ralstonia | 10.11 | EBF vs. MF | 3.72 | 2.94–4.72 | <0.001 |
| Acinetobacter | 9.64 | EBF vs. MF | 1.26 | 1.08–1.47 | 0.003 |
| Gemella | 4.20 | EBF vs. MF | 0.95 | 0.76–1.20 | 0.678 |
| Pseudomonas | 2.69 | EBF vs. MF | 9.60 | 4.53–20.28 | <0.001 |
| Lactobacillus | 2.57 | EBF vs. MF | 6.43 | 3.42-12.10 | <0.001 |
| Escherichia/Shigella | 1.40 | EBF vs. MF | 0.42 | 0.31–0.58 | <0.001 |
| Bifidobacterium | 1.25 | EBF vs. MF | 9.52 | 3.03–29.92 | <0.001 |
| Stenotrophomonas | 1.23 | EBF vs. MF | 1.33 | 0.77–2.28 | 0.303 |
Poisson regression models were run for the top 10 genera based on breastfeeding practices, adjusted for the mode of birth and antibiotic treatment at one month and pre-gestational BMI. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Incidence rate ratio (IRR). Confidence interval (CI). Exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) and mixed feeding (MF) at one month.