Skip to main content
. 2021 May 2;9(5):533. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9050533

Table 3.

Comparative differences in means among various parameters for denture satisfaction at two different intervals of time between the studied groups.

S.No. Denture Parameters GP A (Control) GP B (Test) Unpaired “t” Test Values Karl Pearsons Correlation Coefficient
Mean ± SD
(1 M)
Mean ± SD
(24 M)
Mean ± SD
(1 M)
Mean ± SD
(24 M)
Probable Value R Value
1. Movement maxillary denture 4.69 ± 1.286 5.50 ± 1.674 8.39 ± 0.658 8.04 ± 0.875 0.0000 * 0.1614
2. Comfort maxillary denture 4.84 ± 1.372 5.41 ± 0.988 7.96 ± 0.918 8.25 ± 0.978 0.0000 * 0.1451
3. Movement mandibular denture 4.24 ± 1.031 4.06 ± 1.183 8.39 ± 0.658 7.48 ± 1.122 0.0000 * 0.0211 *
4. Comfort mandibular denture 4.64 ± 1.245 5.49 ±1.198 7.96 ± 0.918 8.36 ± 1.143 0.0000 * 0.1275
5. Speech 5 ± 1.118 5.4 ± 0.882 8.21 ± 0.780 8.24 ± 1.114 0.0000 * 0.1244
6. Ease of chewing 4.72 ± 1.125 5.3 ± 1.113 7.36 ± 0.895 7.85 ± 1.078 0.0000 * 0.0388 *
7. Esthetics 5.15 ± 1.121 4.64 ± 1.087 8.51 ± 0.667 8.34 ± 1.121 0.0000 * 0.0126 *
8. General Satisfaction 5.03 ± 1.103 4.09 ± 1.112 7.90 ± 0.630 8.46 ± 0.786 0.0000 * 0.0473 *

Abbreviation: GP = Group, SD = standard deviation, M = number of months; S: significance level (p < 0.05); *: indicates significant differences. In the unpaired “t” test the level of the degree of significance was determined on the value of p ˂ 0. 05. Degree of linear relationship between two variables determined by the Karl Pearson correlation coefficient expressed as r.