Skip to main content
. 2021 May 17;2021:6663646. doi: 10.1155/2021/6663646

Table 1.

Characteristics of included studies.

Study Study design Country Participants Gender (male %) Age (mean) Anxiety measurement tools (cut-off) Anxiety in patients with vitiligo (%) Quality assessment by NOS (score)
Sharma et al. (2001) Cross-sectional India 30 vitiligo and 30 psoriasis 17 (56.7%) vs. 18 (60.0%) N/A DSM-IV 3.3 6
Ahmed et al. (2007) Cross-sectional Pakistan 100 vitiligo 38 (38.0%) 24.6 PAS 10.0 5
Schmid-Ott et al. (2007) Cross-sectional Germany 363 vitiligo 79 (21.8%) 43.5 ACS-SAA N/A 6
Saleh et al. (2008) Cross-sectional Egypt 50 vitiligo and 50 psoriasis 25 (50.0%) vs. 25 (50.0%) 28.5 vs. 38.2 TMAS 14.0 6
Arýcan et al. (2008) Cross-sectional Turkey 113 vitiligo 53 (46.9%) M: 29.2, F: 33.4 Psychiatrists 15.9 7
AlGhamdi (2010) Cross-sectional Saudi Arabia 164 vitiligo 91 (55.5%) 27 IPQ 57.0 6
Ajose et al. (2014) Cross-sectional Nigeria 102 vitiligo and 87 albinos 51 (50.0%) vs. 53 (60.9%) 35.94 vs. 30.05 HADS-A (>10) 18.6 9
AlShahwan (2015) Cross-sectional Saudi Arabia 64 vitiligo and 811a N/A N/A HADS-A (>10) 26.6 6
Morales-Sanchez et al. (2017) Cross-sectional Mexico 150 vitiligo 47 (31.3%) N/A BAI (>15) 60.0 8
Raikhy et al. (2017) Cross-sectional India 53 vitiligo and 947a N/A N/A ICD-10 11.3 7
Sorour et al. (2017) Cross-sectional Egypt 108 vitiligo and 934a 48 (44.4%) vs. N/A N/A DSM-V 31.5 9
Sawant et al. (2019) Cross-sectional India 100 vitiligo 56 (56.0%) M: 35.8, F: 36.9 ASC-SAA N/A 8
Dabas et al. (2020) Cross-sectional India 95 vitiligo and 86 melasma 34 (35.8%) vs. N/A N/A GAD-7 (>8) 21.1 9
Chen et al. (2020) Cohort China 1432 vitiligo and 5728b 559 (39.0%) vs. 2239 (39.1%) 47.08 vs. 46.09 ICD-9-CM 12.2 8
Balaban et al. (2011) Case control Turkey 42 vitiligo and 33 HCs 19 (45.2%) vs. 14 (42%) 39.70 vs. 35.12 DSM-IV, LSAS 4.8 8
Zang and Ji (2012) Case control China 80 vitiligo and 40 HCs 33 (41.3%) vs. 16 (40.4%) 29.1 vs. 29 SAS (>50) 47.5 8
Karelson et al. (2013) Case control Estonia 54 vitiligo and 57 HCs 22 (40.7%) vs. 23 (40.4%) 36.6 vs. 39.7 ES-Q (>12) 22.0 7
Wei et al. (2013) Case control China 55 vitiligo and 118 HCs 29 (52.7%) vs. 60 (50.8%) 40.98 vs. 40.56 HAMA (>14) 10.9 5
Mufaddel and Abdelgani (2014) Case control Sudan 24 vitiligo and 105 HCs N/A N/A HADS-A (>8) 62.5 7
Karia et al. (2015) Case control India 50 vitiligo and 50 HCs 22 (44.0%) vs. N/A 33.6 vs. N/A DSM-IV 8.0 7
Ucuz et al. (2020) Case control Turkey 30 vitiligo and 30 HCs 18 (60%) vs. 18 (60%) 12.3 vs. 13.3 K-SADS-PL 10.0 6

Abbreviations: N/A: not applicable; HCs: healthy controls; M: males; F: females; NOS: Newcastle–Ottawa Scale; AHRQ-11: 11 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; DSM-IV: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition; PAS: Psychiatric Assessment Schedule; ACS-SAA: Adjustment to Chronic Skin Diseases Questionnaire-Social Anxiety/Avoidance; TMAS: Taylor Manifest Anxiety Scale; IPQ: Illness Perception Questionnaire; LSAS: Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale; SAS: Self-Rating Anxiety Scale; ES-Q: Emotional State Questionnaire; HAMA: Hamilton Anxiety Scale; HADS-A: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety; BAI: Beck's Anxiety Inventory; ICD-10: International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition; DSM-V: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition; ICD-9-CM: International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification; GAD-7: General Anxiety Disorder-7; K-SADS-PL: Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version. aNonvitiligo patients with skin diagnosis; bpatients without vitiligo.