Skip to main content
. 2021 May 16;2021:3236892. doi: 10.1155/2021/3236892

Table 2.

Comparison of N1 and P1 wave amplitude density and peak time of Mf-ERG 2 ring and Mf-ERG 3 ring.

Groups n N1 wave amplitude density N1 peak P1 wave amplitude density P1 peak
Right eye Left eye Right eye Left eye Right eye Left eye Right eye Left eye
Mf-ERG 2 ring Observation group 11 40.16 ± 17.72 40.62 ± 15.40 24.80 ± 2.15 24.16 ± 2.78## 101.80 ± 16.08 109.66 ± 14.61 44.47 ± 2.33 45.19 ± 2.18#
Control group 11 43.55 ± 11.06 46.32 ± 10.09 24.16 ± 2.02 25.41 ± 2.36 111.41 ± 22.10 122.56 ± 18.88 43.42 ± 1.64 42.78 ± 2.65
Mf-ERG 3 ring Observation group 11 26.37 ± 9.58 21.60 ± 5.73∗∗ 24.35 ± 1.50 24.16 ± 2.67 65.90 ± 15.38 67.41 ± 9.14 42.15 ± 2.32 43.49 ± 2.21#
Control group 11 26.23 ± 5.47 27.94 ± 3.76 22.57 ± 2.22 23.46 ± 1.92 69.98 ± 11.95 74.06 ± 14.96 43.49 ± 1.59 43.75 ± 1.25

P < 0.05 compared with the control group, ∗∗P < 0.01 compared with the control group, #P < 0.05 compared with the right eye, and ##P < 0.01 compared with the right eye. These tests were repeated not less than 6 times.