Skip to main content
. 2021 May 15;2021:8851958. doi: 10.1155/2021/8851958

Table 1.

Characteristics of different cine acquisition strategies.

Method #stacks × #slices (× overlaps) Spatial resolution (mm) Temporal resolution (ms) Myocardium SNR (mean ± SD) Blood-to-myocardium CNR (mean ± SD) Total scan time (s) % time saving
CONV 16 2D slices 1.8 × 1.8 × 8 27 29 ± 7 69 ± 14 270
2-SA 2 × 14 × 4 1.8 × 1.8 × 7 40 32 ± 8  50 ± 21  48 82%
1-SA 1 × 20 1.8 × 1.8 × 7 40 29 ± 9  37 ± 15 20 93%
2-AXIAL 2 × 34 × 8 2.5 × 2.5 × 2.8 40 36 ± 11  15 ± 7 48 82%
1-AXIAL 1 × 46 2.5 × 2.5 × 2.8 40 33 ± 8  12 ± 3 21 92%

Abbreviations: CONV: conventional 2D cine acquisition; 2-SA: 3D-cine acquisition of two overlapping slabs in the short-axis (SA) direction; 1-SA: 3D-cine acquisition of one thick slab in the SA direction; 2-AXIAL: 3D-cine acquisition of two overlapping slabs in the axial direction with semi-isotropic resolution; 1-AXIAL: 3D-cine acquisition of one thick slab in the axial direction. Shown scan times include recovery time inbetween repeated breath-holds. CNR: contrast-to-noise ratio; SNR: signal-to-noise ratio.