Skip to main content
. 2021 May 25;42(7):5357–5365. doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-01860-y

Table 4.

Multiple linear regression results of participants’ amount of given money in the dictator game as a function of the FFMQ facets, the guilt-level manipulation, and the interaction effect between the Nonjudge facet and the guilt-level manipulation in Study 2A (N = 109), Study 2B (525), and Study 2C (N = 300)

Parameter estimates
Study 2A Study 2B Study 2C
Step Predictors B SE p B SE p B SE p
(1) Nonjudge facet −0.15 0.12 .213 −3.52 1.02 .001 1.38 1.02 .178
Act aware facet 0.04 0.12 .720 −2.07 1.08 .055 −0.24 0.98 .810
Nonreact facet 0.12 0.12 .289 3.16 1.13 .005 −0.39 0.95 .684
Observe facet 0.05 0.11 .641 0.08 1.21 .947 0.90 0.90 .315
Describe facet 0.10 0.11 .394 0.27 1.28 .833 −1.07 0.94 .260
(2) Guilt 0.25 0.11 .027 0.93 0.63 .139 3.34 0.84 < .001
(3) Guilt × Nonjudge facet −0.25 0.11 .020 1.19 0.63 .058 −1.15 0.85 .856

The FFMQ facets were z-standardized; low guilt-level = −1, high guilt-level = 1. Significant values are marked in bold face