Skip to main content
. 2005 Sep;26(8):1967–1972.

TABLE 3:

Combination of two MR imaging signs of tumor recurrence versus radiation necrosis results

CC MID SUB CC MID MEF CC MID SPW CC MID SEP CC SUB MEF CC SUB SPW CC SUB SEP CC MEF SPW CC MEF SEP CC SPW SEP Pathologic Diagnosis
Presence 11 8 11 9 13 16 14 13 11 14 Necrosis
Absence 25 28 25 27 23 20 22 23 25 22 Necrosis
Presence 23 21 15 14 30 24 23 22 21 15 Tumor
Absence 22 24 30 31 15 21 22 23 24 30 Tumor
P value* .07 .04 .81 .62 .01 .50 .37 .27 .17 .64
Sign favors diagnosis of Tumor Tumor Tumor Tumor Tumor Tumor Tumor Tumor Tumor Neither
    Se (%) 51.1 46.7 33.3 31.1 66.7 53.3 51.1 48.9 46.7 N/A
    Sp (%) 69.4 77.8 69.4 75.0 63.9 55.6 61.1 63.9 69.4 N/A
    PPV (%) 67.6 72.4 57.7 60.9 69.8 60.0 62.2 62.9 65.6 N/A
    NPV (%) 53.2 53.8 45.5 46.6 60.5 48.8 50.0 50.0 51.0 N/A
Accuracy (%) 59.3 60.5 49.4 50.6 65.4 54.3 55.6 55.6 56.8 N/A

CC indicates corpus callosum involvement; MID, midline spread; SUB, subependymal spread; MEF, new discrete multiple enhancing foci; SPW, “spreading wavefront” appearance; SEP, septum pellucidum involvement; Se, sensitivity; Sp, specficity; PPV, positive predictive values; and NPV, negative predictive values.

*

Fisher’s exact 2-tailed test.