Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 6;55(Suppl 1):142–148. doi: 10.1007/s43465-020-00261-w

Table 4.

Summarizing various case series that studied the efficacy of PRP injection in plantar fasciitis

Study Type of case series No of patients No of PRP injections Outcome measures Final follow-up Study conclusion (effectiveness of PRP injection)
Ragab and Othman [26] (2012) Prospective 25 1 VAS, Ultrasound 12 months Effective
Martinelli et al. [25] (2013) Prospective 14 3 VAS, RM score 12 months Effective
Kumar et al. [27] (2013) Prospective 44 (50 heels) 1 VAS, AOFAS score, RM score 6 months Effective
Wilson et al. [35] (2014) Prospective 12 (24 heels) 1 FAAM, Foot-SANE score, SF-12v2 12 months Effective

VAS, visual analogue scale, AOFAS score, The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Score, RM-Roles and Maudsley score, FAAM- Foot and Ankle Ability Measure Score, SANE- Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, SF-12v2- Short Form 12 item (version 2)