Skip to main content
. 2021 May 25;11:10845. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89221-4

Table 3.

Effect of planting density on leaf nutrient contents (pooled data for 2015–16 to 2019–20).

Treatments N (%) P (%) K (%) Cu Fe Mn Zn
(%) (ppm)
Control 2.39 (30.2a) 0.090 (17.5b) 1.64 (23.6d) 13.7 (18.9a,b) 129.1 (24.5b) 68.8 (16.1c) 20.1 (10.2a)
HDP-1 2.44 (29.9a) 0.100 (19.4a) 1.77 (26.6a) 14.3 (19.7a) 116.7 (22.2c) 76.9 (18.6a) 15.5 (7.6b)
HDP-2 2.44 (29.9a) 0.100 (18.4b) 1.69 (24.9b,c) 13.9 (18.2b,c) 133.5 (25.9a) 74.9 (17.0b,c) 20.5 (10.7a)
UHDP-1 2.40 (28.2b) 0.100 (19.6a) 1.79 (25.6b) 11.9 (16.9c) 132.2 (24.9a,b) 75.8 (17.9a,b) 20.4 (9.7a)
UHDP-2 2.32 (28.1b) 0.100 (17.9b) 1.68 (24.2 c,d) 12.5 (17.5b,c) 128.6 (24.6a,b) 67.2 (15.7c) 19.0 (9.3a)

Figures under parenthesis are transformed values.

Means with at least one letter common are not statistically significant using TUKEY's Honest Significant Difference at 5%

Control: Planting at 6 m (row to row) × 6 m (plant to plant) spacing (tree density—277 plants ha−1), HDP-1: Planting at 6 m (row to row) × 3 m (plant to plant) spacing (tree density—555 plants ha−1), HDP-2: Planting at 4 m (row to row) × 4 m (plant to plant) spacing (tree density—625 plants ha−1), UHDP-1: Planting at 4 m (row to row) × 2 m (plant to plant) spacing (tree density—1250 plants ha−1), UHDP-2: Planting at 2 m (row to row) × 2 m (plant to plant) spacing (tree density—2500 plants ha−1).