Skip to main content
. 2021 May 25;11:10845. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89221-4

Table 4.

Effect of planting density on incidence of insect pests (pooled data for 2015–16 to 2019–20).

Treatments Leaf miner
Infestation (%)
Psylla population (per 5 cm twig) Aphid population (twig−1) Mite infestation (%)
Control 18.46 (24.02d) 6.44 (2.45e) 8.23 (2.83e) 10.67 (19.05d)
HDP-1 25.54 (29.57c) 9.98 (3.10d) 10.58 (3.23d) 14.73 (22.55d)
HDP-2 31.20 (33.32b) 15.02 (3.78c) 15.49 (3.90c) 20.70 (26.98c)
UHDP-1 34.96 (35.77b) 20.52 (4.39b) 20.66 (4.53b) 26.58 (30.99b)
UHDP-2 40.07 (39.03a) 27.59 (5.10a) 30.58 (5.48a) 32.63 (34.76a)

Figures under parenthesis are transformed values.

Means with at least one letter common are not statistically significant using TUKEY's Honest Significant Difference at 5%

Control: Planting at 6 m (row to row) × 6 m (plant to plant) spacing (tree density—277 plants ha−1), HDP-1: Planting at 6 m (row to row) × 3 m (plant to plant) spacing (tree density—555 plants ha−1), HDP-2: Planting at 4 m (row to row) × 4 m (plant to plant) spacing (tree density—625 plants ha−1), UHDP-1: Planting at 4 m (row to row) × 2 m (plant to plant) spacing (tree density—1250 plants ha−1), UHDP-2: Planting at 2 m (row to row) × 2 m (plant to plant) spacing (tree density—2500 plants ha−1).