Table 4.
Impact of ARTEMIS on recognition after controlling for co-variates using Generalized Estimating Equation (incorrect recognition set as reference group).
| Time-point 1 and 2 (n = 390) | Time-point 2 and 3 (n = 324) | Time-point 1 and 3 (n = 324) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95% CI | P-Value | OR | 95% CI | P-Value | OR | 95% CI | P-Value | |||
| Age | 0.953 | 0.824 to 1.101 | 0.510 | Age | 0.837 | 0.638 to 1.097 | 0.197 | Age | 0.931 | 0.750 to 1.157 | 0.521 |
| Gender | Gender | Gender | |||||||||
| Male | 0.656 | 0.296 to 1.457 | 0.301 | Male | 1.866 | 0.462 to 7.537 | 0.381 | Male | 0.732 | 0.265 to 2.021 | 0.547 |
| Female | Ref | Female | Ref | . | Female | Ref | . | ||||
| Ethnicity | Ethnicity | Ethnicity | |||||||||
| Non-Chinese | 0.521 | 0.243 to 1.117 | 0.094 | Non-Chinese | 0.705 | 0.210 to 2.360 | 0.570 | Non-Chinese | 0.879 | 0.279 to 2.766 | 0.825 |
| Chinese | Ref | Chinese | Ref | . | Chinese | Ref | . | ||||
| Close friend/family with mental illness | Close friend/family with mental illness | Close friend/family with mental illness | |||||||||
| Yes | 2.161 | 1.010 to 4.624 | 0.047* | Yes | 6.412 | 1.303 to 31.564 | 0.022* | Yes | 4.026 | 1.422 to 11.396 | 0.009** |
| No | Ref | . | No | Ref | . | No | Ref | . | |||
| Past experience in mental health field | Past experience in mental health field | Past experience in mental health field | |||||||||
| Yes | 1.846 | 0.827 to 7.569 | 0.287 | Yes | 2.844 | 0.444 to 18.236 | 0.270 | Yes | 2.733 | 0.746 to 10.010 | 0.129 |
| No | Ref | . | No | Ref | . | No | Ref | . | |||
| Time-Point | Time-Point | Time-Point | |||||||||
| 2 | 2.816 | 1.667 to 4.755 | <0.001** | 3 | 0.898 | 0.409 to 1.972 | 0.788 | 3 | 2.949 | 1.610 to 5.400 | <0.001** |
| 1 | Ref | . | . | 2 | Ref | . | . | 1 | Ref | . | . |
p-value significant at <0.05.
p-value significant at <0.01, Time-point 1: Pre-intervention, Time-point 2: Post-intervention, Time-point 3: 3-months follow-up.
Values in bold denotes significance <0.05 or <0.01.