Challenges identified |
Information quality |
Information amount |
(a) Untimely information |
(b) Irrelevant information |
(c) Confusing information |
(d) Missing information |
(e) Information overload |
(f) Information multiplicity |
Information is outdated or not yet relevant |
Information is not relevant at all or only to a group of users |
Information misplaced or insufficiently structured |
Relevant information has not been provided |
There is more information than users can process |
There are multiple versions of the information |
|
Potential AI solutions |
(i) Identify and verify low-quality information |
(ii) Targeted information for different user groups |
(iii) Visually summarize relevant information |
(iv) Jointly present multiple versions |
Identify outdated, irrelevant, confusing or missing information using AI, visualize it to users, and recommend information creators to amend, move, or verify low-quality information |
Identify the varying informational needs of different user groups and intelligently adapt the ordering, selection, and presentation of the information to the identified varied needs |
Select a certain number of most relevant topics, fully-automatically identify those parts of the information that contribute most to these topics, and visualize them to the users |
Compute the differences between multiple concomitant versions, evaluate them in relation to significance, and present them in reverse-chronological order to the users |
Required data |
Unlabeled NCPs and HDSs, preferably with only high-quality reports having been selected by care professionals |
NCPs and HDSs where each section is labeled with its relevance, manually labeled by care professionals |
Excerpts from NCPs and HDSs relevant to the topics selected and manually labeled by care professionals |
Semantic text similarity scores for pairs of texts, reusing existing clinical data sets extracted from electronic health records |