Skip to main content
. 2021 May 11;21(10):3319. doi: 10.3390/s21103319

Table 1.

A summary of the literature and related works about gestures and activities recognition of normal and autistic people.

Ref. No Sensors Activities Features Algorithms and Accuracy
[2] Moto 360 smartwatch Flapping, painting, and sibbing Discrete cosine transform, FFT, variance, bi-spectrum, z transform, entropy Simple tree, complex tree, linear and gaussian SVM, boosted and bagged ensemble trees
Accuracy: 96.7%
[34] ECG, accelerometer, gyroscope, magnetometer Walking, climbing stairs, frontal elevation of arms, knees bending, cycling, jogging, running, jump front and back, sitting, relaxing Mean, standard deviation, and correlation Mean prediction rate 99.69%,
HMM 89.98%, DBN 92.01%, RNN 99.69%
[35] Not mentioned 9 uniform hand gestures Not mentioned, total 576 features extracted SVM 98.72%
[36] Gyroscope, accelerometer Hand movements, body movements Publicly available dataset features Convolutional neural network 87.1%, KNN 66.1%, SVM 77.1%, fully CN 88%
[37] Not mentioned Static and dynamic unistroke hand gestures Not mentioned SVM 97.95%
[38] Accelerometer, magnetometer, gyroscope Jogging, walking, cycling jumping, running, jump-rope Mean, standard dev, kurtosis, skewness, range, correlation, spectral energy, spectral entropy, peak frequencies, and cross-spectral densities SVM 26%, DT 93.24%, KNN 96.07%, RF 97.12%, Naïve Bayes 76.47%
[39] Accelerometer, strain sensor Walking, eating Mean value, standard dev, percentiles, and correlation frequency domain (energy, entropy) DT 93.15%
[40] Camera Gestures of alphabets Not mentioned KNN 94.49%
[41] Flex sensor, accelerometer, camera, Malaysian sign language gestures Not mentioned General algorithm for the data-glove detection system 78.33–5%
[42] Camera 24 Fingerspelling static gestures Not mentioned KNN classifier 87.38%, Logistic regression 84.32%, naïve Bayes classifier 84.62%, support vector machine (SVM) 91.35%
[43] Leap Motion Sensor Gestures for greetings, possessive adjectives, colors, numbers, names, etc. Not mentioned Hidden Markov models (HMM) 87.4%, KNN+DTW 88.4%
[44] Accelerometer Cycling, sedentary, ambulation Mean, standard deviation, acceleration range SVM from 88.5% to 91.6%
[45] Not mentioned ASL alphabets and
basic hand shapes
The number of fingers, the width and height of the gesture, the distance between the hand fingers, etc. Type-2 Fuzzy HMM (T2FHMM)
100% accuracy for uniform hand images and 95.5% for cluttered hand images
[24] Flex sensor Patterns representing:
  • Letters/Words

  • Numbers

Not mentioned K-nearest neighbor
decision tree
dynamic time warpinga
verage accuracy = 90%
[46] QA screening method using mobile app Not mentioned Age, sex, ethnicity, country of residence, etc. RIPPER 80.95%, C4.5 82.54%
[47] Not mentioned Dataset taken from UCL Machine Learning repository Common attributes like age, nationality, sex, etc. Not mentioned SVM 98.30%, KNN 88.13%, CNN 98.30% ANN 98.30%, naïve Bayes 94.91%, LR 98.30%