Skip to main content
. 2021 May 11;11(5):301. doi: 10.3390/metabo11050301

Table 9.

Effects of LPHF, HPHF, and/or training on liver gene expression.

Gene Con Groups LPHF Groups HPHF Groups Significance
Con Con+T LPHF LPHF+T HPHF HPHF+T Training Feed Interaction
F480
(Inflammation)
1.00 ± 0.26 0.95 ± 0.23 1.30 ± 0.76 0.72 ± 0.35 0.79 ± 0.29 0.72 ± 0.19 n.s. n.s. n.s.
Hmgcs2
(Ketogenesis)
1.00 ± 0.56 0.65 ± 0.59 3.71 ± 2.30 2.73 ± 0.78 1.33 ± 0.99 1.26 ± 0.50 n.s. *** n.s.
Il-6
(Inflammation)
1.00 ± 0.57 0.70 ± 0.22 2.32 ± 3.37 0.31 ± 0.19 0.65 ± 0.41 0.92 ± 1.18 n.s. n.s. n.s.
Pparγ
(Glucose metabolism)
1.00 ± 0.44 0.55 ± 0.13 1.10 ± 0.45 0.98 ± 0.26 1.06 ± 0.45 1.34 ± 0.60 n.s. * n.s.
Cxcl2
(Inflammation)
1.00 ± 0.47 1.07 ± 1.08 0.55 ± 0.32 0.42 ± 0.31 0.51 ± 0.52 1.12 ± 0.92 n.s. n.s. n.s.
Atgl
(Fatty acid mobilization)
1.00 ± 0.41 0.89 ± 0.60 0.81 ± 0.48 0.32 ± 0.15 0.34 ± 0.17 0.46 ± 0.34 n.s. ** n.s.
Fgf21
(Energy metabolism)
1.00 ± 1.11 0.57 ± 0.70 5.06 ± 3.88 3.75 ± 3.43 0.65 ± 0.33 1.15 ± 0.97 n.s. *** n.s.
Klotho
(FGF21 receptor)
1.00 ± 0.17 0.86 ± 0.24 0.85 ± 0.20 0.86 ± 0.30 0.60 ± 0.16 0.70 ± 0.18 n.s. ** n.s.
Pparα
(Fatty acid oxidation)
1.00 ± 0.42 0.55 ± 0.27 0.32 ± 0.16 0.39 ± 0.08 0.81 ± 0.38 0.89 ± 0.69 n.s. *** n.s.
Pgc1α
(Fatty acid mobilization)
1.00 ± 0.22 1.65 ± 1.26 0.66 ± 0.22 0.43 ± 0.09 0.36 ± 0.09 0.58 ± 0.74 n.s. *** n.s.

Data (fold changes) are presented as the mean ± SD. n = 4–8 for each group. Con, Con+T, LPHF, LPHF+T, HPHF, and HPHF+T represent chow diet, chow diet plus training, low-protein high-fat diet, low-protein high-fat diet plus training, high-protein high-fat diet, and high-protein high-fat diet plus training, respectively. Feed, training, and interaction indicate a dominant effect of diet, treadmill exercise, and the interactive effect between feed and training, respectively. n.s., no significance was observed. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001.