. 2021 May 9;11(5):1345. doi: 10.3390/ani11051345

Table 4.

ANOVA and Spearman correlations based on frequency of presence.

					p-Value	Spearman Correlation (r)
Worm Species	CON	IVM	MOX	PYR	Treatment	MOX
CO. coronatus	1.00 ^a	0.77 ^ac	0.20 ^b	0.64 ^c	3.36 × 10⁻⁶ ***	−0.44
CO. labiatus	0.17 ^a	0.08 ^a	0.06 ^a	0.04 ^a	0.403
CO. labratum	0.19 ^a	0.04 ^a	0.24 ^a	2.7 × 10^{−17 a}	0.038 *	0.36
CS. catinatum	1.00 ^a	0.83 ^a	0.56 ^a	0.83 ^a	0.066
CS. tetracanthum	0.02 ^a	0.0 ^a	0.06 ^a	0.00 ^a	0.281
CY. ashworthi	1.00 ^a	0.83 ^a	0.47 ^b	0.75 ^a	0.0004 ***	−0.38
CY. auriculatus	0.42 ^a	0.31 ^a	0.21 ^a,b	0.24 ^a	0.045 *
CY. insigne	0.57 ^a	0.52 ^a,c	0.21 ^b	0.46 ^b,c	9.2 × 10⁻⁵ ***	−0.31
CY. leptostomus	0.76 ^a	0.67 ^a	0.27 ^b	0.44 ^b	1.13 × 10⁻⁵ ***	−0.32
CY. nassatus	0.85 ^a	0.83 ^a	0.47 ^b	0.79 ^a	3.04 × 10⁻⁵ ***	−0.34
CY. radiatus	0.97 ^a	0.71 ^a	0.33 ^b	0.69 ^a	0.0004 ***	−0.41
CS. pateratum	0.91 ^a	0.83 ^a	0.67 ^a	0.81 ^a	0.00159 ***
CY. elongatus	0.56 ^a	0.31 ^a	0.22 ^a	0.38 ^a	0.106
CD. bicoronatus	0.48 ^a	0.42 ^a	0.16 ^b	0.36 ^a	0.108
CT. calicatus	0.97 ^a	0.77 ^a,c	0.36 ^b	0.61 ^b,c	0.0005 ***	−0.31
CT. goldi	0.92 ^a	0.79 ^a	0.74 ^a	0.78 ^a	0.189
CT. longibursatus	1.00 ^a	0.83 ^a,b	0.71 ^b	0.89 ^a,b	0.025 *
CT. minutus	0.57 ^a	0.54 ^a	0.13 ^b	0.46 ^a	0.074	−0.36

CON–control; MOX–Moxidectin; IVM–Ivermectin; PYR–Pyrantel. Superscripts with different letters within row demonstrate p < 0.05 with Tukey’s all-pair comparison testing. Spearman correlations for IVM and PYR are not shown because no significant correlations were found. ANOVA significance was determined at (p ≤ 0.05) and a tendency toward significance at (0.05 ≤ p ≥ 0.10). Spearman’s coefficient, r, significance was determined at (0.3 ≤ r ≥ −0.3). The Spearman correlation, r, is considered to be fairly significant at (≥+/−0.3–<+/−0.5), moderate with (≥+/−0.5–<+/−0.7), strong with (≥+/−0.7–<+/−0.9), and substantial with (≥ +/−0.9–+/−1.0).