Skip to main content
. 2021 May 12;10(5):966. doi: 10.3390/plants10050966

Table 3.

Average cannabinoid content (%) of Carmagnola selected, Tiborszallasi, and Finola selection. Groups (a, b, c, and d) were formed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) using different hemp phenotypes. The same letters present similarities between phenotypes, while different letters present differences between phenotypes. Values are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD).

CI SD CII SD TI SD TII SD TIII SD TIV SD TV SD FI SD FII SD FIII SD FIV SD
CBD 0.05 a 0.04 0.10 a 0.04 0.07 a 0.03 0.04 a 0.02 0.05 a 0.02 0.07 a 0.04 0.06 a 0.03 0.60 b 0.08 0.78 c 0.12 0.61 b 0.12 0.64 b 0.19
CBD-A 1.70 a 1.53 3.78 b 0.94 3.22 b 1.11 3.11 b 0.56 2.65 a,b 1.06 3.78 b 0.62 2.93 b 1.37 6.48 c 0.35 6.41 c 0.35 6.36 c 0.25 6.59 c 0.24
CBG 0.04 b,c 0.02 0.04 b,c 0.01 0.01 a 0.01 0.01 a 0.01 0.01 a 0.01 0.02 a,b 0.02 0.02 a 0.01 0.05 c,d 0.01 0.05 c,d 0.01 0.06 d 0.01 0.06 d 0.02
CBG-A 1.62 b 2.39 0.44 a 0.24 0.25 a 0.08 0.16 a 0.05 0.19 a 0.06 0.22 a 0.07 0.18 a 0.07 1.00 a,b 0.37 0.63 a,b 0.16 0.91 a,b 0.23 1.11 a,b 0.26
Δ-9-THC 0.05 a,b,c 0.09 0.04 a,b,c 0.05 0.04 a,b,c 0.03 0.01 a 0.01 0.02 a,b 0.02 0.01 a 0.01 0.06 b,c,d 0.05 0.08 c,d 0.02 0.11 d 0.02 0.08 c,d 0.01 0.08 c,d 0.02
Δ-9-THC-A 0.91 a,b 1.81 0.75 a,b 1.26 0.71 a,b 0.72 0.14 a 0.03 0.53 a,b 0.54 0.18 a 0.04 1.39 b 1.23 0.50 a,b 0.08 0.46 a,b 0.07 0.47 a,b 0.06 0.51 a,b 0.05
CBC 0.01 a,b 0.00 0.02 a 0.01 0.01 a,b 0.01 0.00 a 0.00 0.01 a,b 0.01 0.01 a,b 0.01 0.01 a,b 0.00 0.05 c 0.01 0.06 d 0.01 0.05 c 0.01 0.05 c 0.01
CBC-A 0.20 a 0.06 0.27 a 0.09 0.34 a 0.21 0.24 a 0.10 0.25 a 0.07 0.34 a 0.16 0.30 a 0.16 0.62 b 0.10 0.59 b 0.09 0.64 b 0.10 0.64 b 0.10