Table 2.
Models | 10-Fold Cross Validation | Independent | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Predictor | ACC | F-Score | ACC | F-Score |
LSTM-emb | 0.700 | 0.735 | 0.734 | 0.779 |
CNN-emb | 0.704 | 0.739 | 0.733 | 0.776 |
BiLSTM-onehot | 0.725 | 0.729 | 0.757 | 0.777 |
CNN-onehot | 0.719 | 0.731 | 0.748 | 0.778 |
CNN-onehot-PCA | 0.748 | 0.750 | 0.768 | 0.786 |
Comb-emb-PCA (UbiComb) | 0.804 | 0.795 | 0.818 | 0.825 |
RF-Comb | 0.762 | 0.757 | 0.781 | 0.800 |
The Comb-emb-PCA (UbiComb) provided the best results in terms of 10-fold cross-validation and independent results.