Skip to main content
. 2021 May 11;12(5):717. doi: 10.3390/genes12050717

Table 2.

Results of different techniques.

Models 10-Fold Cross Validation Independent
Predictor ACC F-Score ACC F-Score
LSTM-emb 0.700 0.735 0.734 0.779
CNN-emb 0.704 0.739 0.733 0.776
BiLSTM-onehot 0.725 0.729 0.757 0.777
CNN-onehot 0.719 0.731 0.748 0.778
CNN-onehot-PCA 0.748 0.750 0.768 0.786
Comb-emb-PCA (UbiComb) 0.804 0.795 0.818 0.825
RF-Comb 0.762 0.757 0.781 0.800

The Comb-emb-PCA (UbiComb) provided the best results in terms of 10-fold cross-validation and independent results.