Skip to main content
. 2021 May 11;11(5):1356. doi: 10.3390/ani11051356

Table 5.

Effects of different forms of zinc oxide on apparent total tract and ileum digestibility in weaned piglets (n = 20).

Zn, Status, and Level CON ZnO Chelate
-ZnO
Nano
-ZnO
SE p-Value
Items 0 2500 200 200 trt
One week
Feed intake, g 232.5 242.5 250.0 250.0 9.5 0.557
Zinc intake, mg x,y,z 23.3 c 524.6 a 89.0 b 87.3 b 8.0 0.001
Zinc excretion, mg x,y,z,w 21.3 d 461.6 a 36.8 c 69.5 b 4.3 0.001
ATTD of Zinc, % x,y,z,w 8.3 c 11.9 c 58.4 a 20.4 b 2.6 0.001
Two week
Feed intake, g 300.0 300.0 300.0 300.0 1.7 1.000
Zinc intake, mg x,y,z 30.0 c 663.58 a 106.8 b 107.6 b 2.8 0.001
Zinc excretion, mg x,y,z,w 28.1 d 612.1 a 55.2 c 76.8 b 6.1 0.001
ATTD of Zinc, % x,y,z,w 6.4 c 7.8 c 48.4 a 28.7 b 1.9 0.001
AID of Zinc, % x,y,z,w 5.0 c 5.3 c 39.2 a 23.0 b 0.6 0.001

Abbreviation: CON, no additional added zinc oxide in diet (negative control); ZnO, CON + 2500 ppm zinc oxide(positive control); chelate-ZnO, CON + zinc chelate; nano-ZnO, CON + nanoparticle size of zinc; SE, standard error; ATTD, apparent total tract digestibility; AID, apparent ileum digestibility. a,b,c,d Means within a row with different letters are significantly different at p < 0.05. x contrast: CON vs. other treatments (p < 0.05). y contrast: ZnO vs. chelate- ZnO (p < 0.05). z contrast: ZnO vs. nano- ZnO (p < 0.05). w contrast: chelate-ZnO vs. nano-ZnO (p < 0.05).