Skip to main content
. 2021 May 7;11(5):71. doi: 10.3390/bs11050071

Table 2.

Differences, associations, and heteroscedasticity of the errors between the actual and predicted 1RMs during the back squat exercise.

Group 1RM Prediction Method Raw Diff (kg) p-Value ES r
(Pearson)
r
(heteroscedasticity)
Whole Multiple-point (n = 38) −1.3 ± 18.8 0.570 −0.04 0.92 0.45 ^
Distant two-point (n = 38) −1.7 ± 14.4 0.463 −0.05 0.91 0.42 ^
Load-load (n = 31) −1.0 ± 24.1 0.814 −0.03 0.74 0.39 ^
High-load (n = 38) −4.0 ± 13.4 0.071 −0.13 0.93 0.48 ^
Young Multiple-point (n = 19) 1.1 ± 12.1 0.689 0.04 0.95 0.66 ^
Distant two-point (n = 19) 0.1 ± 10.8 0.965 0.00 0.96 0.68 ^
Load-load (n = 18) −0.5 ± 24.9 0.927 −0.02 0.71 0.36 ^
High-load (n = 19) −0.9 ± 12.5 0.755 −0.03 0.95 0.65 ^
Middle-aged Multiple-point (n = 19) −3.7 ± 15.3 0.306 −0.16 0.78 0.21
Distant two-point (n =19) −3.6 ± 17.4 0.382 −0.16 0.73 0.26
Load-load (n = 13) −1.7 ± 23.8 0.802 −0.07 0.62 0.59 ^
High-load (n = 19) −7.2 ± 13.9 0.037 * −0.32 0.81 0.18

Data are mean ± standard deviation. Raw diff, Raw differences; ES, Cohen’s d effect size ([Predicted 1RM—Actual 1RM]/SD both); rPearson, Pearson’s correlation coefficient; rheteroscedasticity, heteroscedasticity of the errors; *, p is < 0.05; ^ denotes heteroscedasticity (i.e., r > 0.32).