Skip to main content
. 2021 May 7;11(5):71. doi: 10.3390/bs11050071

Table 3.

Differences, associations, and heteroscedasticity of the errors between the actual and predicted 1RMs during the bent-over-row exercise.

Group 1RM Prediction Method Raw Diff (kg) p-Value ES r
(Pearson)
r
(heteroscedasticity)
Whole Multiple-point (n = 35) 6.4 ± 14.1 0.011 * 0.34 0.77 0.50 ^
Distant two-point (n = 35) 10.3 ± 14.5 <0.001 * 0.56 0.74 0.44 ^
Load-load (n = 30) −2.4 ± 20.8 0.403 −0.14 0.72 0.68 ^
High-load (n = 33) 10.1 ± 17.0 0.002 * 0.50 0.77 0.66 ^
Young Multiple-point (n = 19) 8.3 ± 16.9 0.046 * 0.43 0.71 0.56 ^
Distant two-point (n = 19) 10.4 ± 16.6 0.014 * 0.54 0.71 0.54 ^
Load-load (n = 18) 0.3 ± 23.6 0.964 0.01 0.68 0.74 ^
High-load (n = 19) 10.9 ± 19.1 0.023 * 0.52 0.72 0.66 ^
Middle-aged Multiple-point (n = 16) 4.2 ± 9.9 0.110 0.29 0.78 0.31
Distant two-point (n = 16) 10.3 ±12.1 0.004 * 0.69 0.70 0.35 ^
Load-load (n = 12) −8.4 ± 15.2 0.080 −0.56 0.55 0.47 ^
High-load (n = 14) 9.0 ± 14.4 0.035 * 0.50 0.81 0.71 ^

Data are mean ± standard deviation. Raw diff, Raw differences; ES, Cohen’s d effect size ([Predicted 1RM—Actual 1RM]/SD both); rPearson, Pearson’s correlation coefficient; rheteroscedasticity, heteroscedasticity of the errors; *, p is < 0.05; ^ denotes hetereoscedasticity (i.e., r > 0.32).