Skip to main content
. 2021 May 11;10(5):557. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10050557

Table 2.

Agreement between measured and predicted unbound concentration of ceftriaxone.

CEFu Predicted mg/L, Median (IQR) fu % Predicted, Median (IQR) Bias mg/L, Median (IQR) Relative Bias, % of CEFu, Median (IQR) Relative RMSE, % of CEFu p-Value b
Fixed average protein binding 8.3 (3.4–13.9) 10.5 a 5.6 (0.6–12) 38.2 (19.2–50.6) 86.1 <0.0001
Predicted saturable concentration-dependent protein binding, Equation (4) 5 (1.8–10) 6.3 (5.5–7.6) 8.4 (2.2–15.7) 59.2 (50.9–68) 89 <0.0001
Predicted protein binding, present study, Equation (2) 15.5 (4.2–30.4) 17.9 (12.3–22.6) 0.05 (−0.8–1.1) 0.4 (−5.8–12.6) 14.2 0.627
Predicted protein binding, Bos 21.8 (3.5–62.1) 28.2 (11.7–45.3) −6.2 (−35.9–0.1) −35.9 (−143.7–4.8) 195.3 <0.0001
Predicted protein binding, Leegwater 11.5 (3.2–33.4) 14.7 (10–25.2) 0.3 (−10.1–1.5) 10.2 (−49.5–29.3) 109.2 0.350

CEFu: unbound ceftriaxone concentration; fu: unbound ceftriaxone fraction; 100% fT>MIC: free concentration above the minimum inhibitory concentration over the whole dosing interval (100%); 100% fT4x>MIC: free concentration above 4 times the minimum inhibitory concentration over the whole dosing interval (100%); IQR: interquartile range. a no median (IQR) due to a fixed protein binding coefficient; b null hypothesis = difference between CEFu measured and CEFu predicted is equal to 0.