Skip to main content
. 2021 May 11;10(5):557. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10050557

Table 3.

Agreement for PK/PD target attainment based on measured and predicted unbound concentration of ceftriaxone.

100% fT>MIC,
n (%)
p-Value a 100% fT>4xMIC,
n (%)
p-Value a
Fixed average protein binding 26 (81.2) 1.000 11 (34.4) 0.044
Predicted saturable concentration-dependent protein binding, Equation (4) 23 (71.2) 0.083 5 (15.6) 0.0007
Predicted protein binding, present study, Equation (2) 24 (75) 0.572 13 (40.6) 1.000
Predicted protein binding, Bos 25 (78.1) 0.325 13 (40.6) 0.325
Predicted protein binding, Leegwater 25 (78.1) 0.325 11 (34.4) 0.044

100% fT>MIC: free concentration above the minimum inhibitory concentration over the whole dosing interval (100%); 100% fT4x>MIC: free concentration above 4 times the minimum inhibitory concentration over the whole dosing interval (100%). a Null hypothesis = no difference (i.e., agreement) in PK/PD target attainment based on measured vs. predicted CEFu.