Table 3.
ICR and the average value of the proposed laser ultrasound method and conventional water immersion ultrasound method.
| Device Type | Experimental Method | Normal Part (mV) | Cracked Part (mV) | Image Contrast Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Resistor | Laser ultrasonic | 9.67 | 2.79 | 3.46 |
| Water immersion ultrasonic | 8.50 | 6.48 | 1.31 | |
| Capacitor | Laser ultrasonic | 2.80 | 1.00 | 2.80 |
| Water immersion ultrasonic | 9.74 | 8.19 | 1.19 |