Skip to main content
. 2021 May 12;21(10):3371. doi: 10.3390/s21103371

Table 3.

ICR and the average value of the proposed laser ultrasound method and conventional water immersion ultrasound method.

Device Type Experimental Method Normal Part (mV) Cracked Part (mV) Image Contrast Ratio
Resistor Laser ultrasonic 9.67 2.79 3.46
Water immersion ultrasonic 8.50 6.48 1.31
Capacitor Laser ultrasonic 2.80 1.00 2.80
Water immersion ultrasonic 9.74 8.19 1.19