Skip to main content
. 2021 May 11;13(5):1599. doi: 10.3390/nu13051599

Table 3.

Distribution (%) of students by weight perception, according to actual weight status, in 2000, 2010 and 2017.

Actual Weight Status
(kg/m2)
Perceived Weight Status Males Females
Study Year Study Year
2000 2010 2017 p-Value
2 Test)
2000 2010 2017 p-Value
2 Test)
<18.5 Too thin 38.9 b 87.5 * 95.2 * <0.001 33.3 34.5 36.1 0.826
Just right 61.1 b 12.5 * 4.8 * 63.5 61.9 62.9
Too fat 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.2 3.5 1.0
18.5–24.9 Too thin 24.5 *b 32.7 * 37.2 * <0.001 6.3 3.7 4.5 0.097
Just right 64.9 b 61.4 * 54.0 * 70.1 76.6 76.1
Too fat 10.6 * 6.0 * 8.8 * 23.6 19.7 19.4
25–29.9 Too thin 14.3 ab 1.7 2.8 <0.001 3.8 0.0 0.0 <0.001
Just right 57.1 67.2 *b 44.0 * 42.3 b 18.4 10.5
Too fat 28.6 *b 31.0 * 53.2 * 53.8 b 81.6 89.5
≥30 Too thin 0.0 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 -
Just right 0.0 50.0 21.1 66.6 0.0 0.0
Too fat 100.0 50.0 78.9 33.4 b 100.0 100.0

* p < 0.05 compared with female students; a p < 0.05 compared with 2010 study year, b p < 0.05 compared with 2017 study year (z-test with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons).