Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Food Policy. 2021 Apr 23;101:102089. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2021.102089

Table 1.

Studies Addressing Selection Bias of WIC Participation in Breastfeeding

Public ation Year First Author’s Last Name Data Study Period Sample Size Approach Results
2005 Bitler Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) (19 states) 1992–1999 60,731 State-year fixed effect +
2010 Jiang Panel Study of Income Dynamics 1997 3,276 Propensity score biased negative relations hip
2013 Martin-Anderson Infant Feeding Practices Study II 2005–2007 785 WIC duration
2015 Metallinos-Katsaras Massachusetts WIC Program 2001–2009 122,506 WIC duration +
2016 Bullinger Infant Feeding Practices Study II 2005–2007 3,029 IV (state-level grocery price index)
2016 Gregory Infant Feeding Practices Study II 2005–2007 743 Propensity score no negative
2017 Sonchak South Carolina Birth Certificate Data 2004–2013 16,457 Maternal fixed effects no negative
2017 Topolyan Infant Feeding Practices Study II 2005–2007 2,616 WIC duration
2019 Li National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005–2014 4,308 Propensity score

+/−: Positive/negative relationship between WIC participation and breastfeeding