Skip to main content
. 2021 May 8;9(5):552. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9050552

Table 11.

Respondents’ opinions on the policy on private health insurance for retirees (Afya).

Question Responses General Public [n (%)] Service Providers [n (%)]
The health insurance for retirees policy is a good policy * SA and A 601 (63.9%) 71 (33.9%)
N 296 (31.4%) 116 (55.2%)
D and SD 44 (4.7%) 23 (10.9%)
The health insurance for retirees policy has clear objectives * SA and A 479 (50.9%) 57 (27.1%)
N 380 (40.4%) 107 (51%)
D and SD 82 (8.7%) 46 (21.9%)
The health insurance for retirees policy decreased load on public health services * SA and A 531 (56.4%) 93 (44.3%)
N 366 (38.9%) 101 (48.1%)
D and SD 44 (4.7%) 16 (7.6%)
The health insurance for retirees policy promoted patient choice * SA and A 608 (64.6%) 93 (44.3%)
N 314 (33.4%) 109 (51.9%)
D and SD 19 (2.0%) 8 (3.8%)
The health insurance for retirees policy is misused SA and A 122 (13.0%) 22 (10.5%)
N 540 (57.4%) 120 (57.1%)
D and SD 279 (29.6%) 68 (32.4%)
The health insurance for retirees policy is a step towards privatising healthcare * SA and A 42 (4.5%) 11 (5.3%)
N 451 (47.9%) 124 (59.0%)
D and SD 448 (47.6%) 75 (35.7%)
The health insurance for retirees policy promotes inequality * SA and A 266 (28.3%) 35 (16.6%)
N 458 (48.6%) 132 (62.9%)
D and SD 217 (23.1%) 43 (20.5%)
The beneficiaries of the health insurance for retirees policy should be increased * SA and A 509 (54.1%) 57 (27.2%)
N 373 (39.6%) 120 (57.1%)
D and SD 59 (6.3%) 33 (15.7%)
The treatment package of the health insurance for retirees policy should be increased * SA and A 563 (59.8%) 58 (27.7%)
N 355 (37.7%) 121 (57.6%)
D and SD 23 (2.5%) 31 (14.7%)

SA and A = strongly agree and agree, respectively; N = neither agree nor disagree; D and SD = disagree and strongly disagree, respectively. * The difference between the percentage of the general public group and the service providers’ group’s responses is statistically significant (p < 0.05).