Skip to main content
. 2021 May 26;16:57. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01123-1

Table 6.

Practitioner self-efficacy, outcome expectancies, and perceived acceptability questionnaire scores before and after training

Scale Individual items where not treated as a scale Response options Before training median (range) After training median (range) Wilcoxon z score 95% CI for mean difference scores
Prescriber self-efficacy (n = 67) a. Create individualised patient medication plans 1–10 9 (1–10) 10 (1–10) − 5.20 0.59 to 1.30
b. Increase patient medication when blood pressure remains too high 9 (1–10) 10 (1–10) − 3.06 0.13 to 0.68
c. Integrate the HOME BP programme in to regular care 7 (1–10) 9 (2–10) − 5.95 1.41 to 2.38
Prescriber outcome expectancies mean score (n = 67) 1–5 4.00 (3–5) 4.17 (3.33–5.00) − 5.09 0.19 to 0.36
Prescriber perceived acceptability of the intervention for patients (n = 67) a. Self-monitor their blood pressure at home 1–10 7 (5–10) 8 (5–10) − 4.96 0.62 to 1.30
b. Enter their blood pressure readings in to HOME BP 7 (1–10) 8 (5–10) − 4.72 0.80 to 1.65
c. Make medication changes to control their blood pressure 6 (1–10) 8 (5–10) − 5.57 1.23 to 2.28
Supporter self-efficacy mean score (n = 57) 1–10 7.67 (2.33–10) 9.33 (6.67–10) − 5.55 1.32 to 2.33
Supporter outcome expectancies mean score (n = 57) 1–5 4.17 (3–5) 4.5 (3–5) − 4.34 0.16 to 0.38
Supporter perceived acceptability of the intervention for patients mean score (n = 57) 1–10 6.67 (1–10) 8.33 (3.67–10) − 4.82 0.88 to 2.00