Skip to main content
. 2021 May 26;29:19. doi: 10.1186/s12998-021-00375-4

Table 2.

Sum scores divided in: correct (compliance with quality criteria), errors (no compliance with quality criteria) and stability (same quality in both radiographic series per clinic) in assessments for all clinics. Mean (95% CI) and presented in percentile (p) groups with a proposed grading: A-E

Mean 95% conf. interval Min p10 p25 Median p75 p90 Max

Correctd

Proposed scoringa

E D C B A
 All projections 33.56 (32.69 34.43) 14 25 31 34 37 40 43
 AP/PA 15.26 (14.88 15.65) 7 12 14 16 17 18 18
 L1-L4 9.45 (9.11 9.78) 3 7 8 9 11 12 14
 L5/S1 8.85 (8.50 9.21) 2 6 8 9 10 12 12

Errorc

Proposed scoringa

A B C D E
 All projections 10.42 (9.55 11.29) 1 4 7 10 13 19 30
 AP/PA 2.72 (2.34 3.10) 0 0 1 2 4 6 11
 L1-L4 4.55 (4.22 4.89) 0 2 3 5 6 7 11
 L5/S1 3.14 (2.79 3.50) 0 0 2 3 4 6 10

Stabilityb

Proposed scoringa

E D C B A
 All projections 5.20 (4.72 5.68) 0 2 3 5 7 9 14
 AP/PA 1.96 (1.70 2.21) 0 0 1 2 3 4 6
 L1-L4 1.76 (1.56 1.95) 0 0 1 2 2 3 5
 L5/S1 1.49 (1.28 1.69) 0 0 0 1 2 3 5

aProposed cut point in grading A-E. Only used for the “all projections” group. A = highest grade

bStability in quality measured as whether the two assessed radiographic series had the same scoring (ok versus error)

cSum of errors in all assessments. d Sum of correct assessments. Classified in grades according to mean +/− SD criteria, see Materials and methods section