Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 May 26.
Published in final edited form as: J Heart Lung Transplant. 2019 Aug 10;38(11):1125–1143. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2019.08.014

TABLE 1.

Baseline Characteristics of Patients Supported by Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO)

Author reference – Year of Publication Patient N (Male/Female) Prevalence of ECMO use, % Patient Age Mean in years±SD (Range) Pre-ECMO Cardiac Surgery Procedures
Magovern14 - 1994 21
(17/4)
0.7 61.6 ± 2.2
(33–78)
CABG 66.6%
MV 14.3%
Others 19,1%
Kodera15 - 1996 17
(11/6)
na 41.4
(22–64)
CABG 17.6%
Valve 82.4%
Fiser16 - 2001 51
(29/22)
0.9 61±1.7
(32–77)
CABG 66.6%
Valve 9.8%
CABG +Valve 9.8%
HTx 13.7%
Smedira17 - 2001 107
(77/30)
0.5 na
(18–82)
CABG 56%
Valve 14%
CABG+Valve 18%
Aorta (desc.) 4%
Cong. 7%
LV resection 1%
Ko18 - 2002 76
(48/28)
2.60 56.8±15.9
(na)
CABG 47.7%
Valve 18.4%
CABG+Valve 7.9%
HTx 15.7%
Cong. 3.9%
Ao Diss. 2.7%
Zhang19 - 2006 32
(18/14)
na 55.4±11.9
(30–75)
CABG 15.6%
Valve 31.2%
CABG+Valve 31.2%
CABG+LV An. . 6.2%
PEA 6.2 %
Others 6.2%
Bakhtiary20 - 2007 45
(35/10)
0.8 60.1±13.6
(na)
CABG 44.4%
Valve 4.4%
CABG+Valve 17.8%
CABG+VSD 6.7%
HTx 4.4%
LVAD 11.1%
Others 11,9
Hsu21 - 2010 51
(36/15)
2.9 63±15.7
(na)
CABG 52.9%
Valve 21.6%
CABG+Valve 13.7%
HTx 7.8%
Others 3.9%
Rastan22 - 2010 517
(370/147)
1.28 63.5±11.2
(18–84)
CABG 37.4%
Valve 14.3%
CABG+Valve 16.8%
Thor. Tx 6.5%
Others 25%
Elsharkawy23 - 2010 239
(163/76)
0.58 59.7 (median)
(na)
CABG 44.3%
Valve 33.6%
Pokersnik24 - 2012 49
(33/16)
na 65±13
(na)
na
Mikus25 - 2013 14
(9/5)
0.25 53.1±14.3
(25–70)
CABG 35.7%
Valve 42.9%
Aortic Root 21.4%
Slottosch26 - 2013 77
(59/18)
na 60±13
(25–83)
CABG 55.8%
Valve 13%
CABG +Valve 14.3%
Aorta 6.5%
HTx 2.6%
Others 7.8%
(Redo Surgery 19.5%)
Unosawa27 - 2013 47
(35/12)
na 64.4±12.5
(22–83)
CABG 40.4%
Valve 17%
Valve+CABG 4.2%
Valve+Aorta 2%
Aorta 10.6%
Aorta+CABG 6.4 %
Aortic Root 4.25%
VSD 10.6%
PE 4.25%
Ariyaratnam28 - 2014 14
(8/6)
na 65.6
(na)
Valve+CABG 42.8%
Aortic Root 14.3%
VSD 7%
MVR+Maze 7%
Ao Diss. 7%
Aorta+ AA 7%
VSD+CABG7%
CABG+Lobectomy 7%
Li29 - 2015 123
(81/42)
0.9 51.0±12.2
(70–85)
CABG 35.8%
Valve 32.5%
CABG+Valve 9.8%
CABG+ LVAn. 2.4%
HTx 9%
Others 10.5%
Saxena30 - 2015 a 45
(31/14)
na 76.8±4.6
(70–85)
na
Khorsandi31 - 2016 16
(12/4)
na 71
(34–83)
na
Distelmaier32 - 2016 b 385
(271/114)
3.65 65 (median)
(55–72)
CABG 12.5%
Valve 28.6%
CABG+Valve 21.8%
HTx 17.6%
LVAD 8%
Aorta 6.2%
Others 5.2%
Mazzeffi33 - 2016 b 23
(14/9)
0.42 57±15
(34–86)
CABG 30.4%
Valve 52.2%
Others 17.4%
Chen34 – 2017 1,141
(813/328)
1.91 63.8±13.2
(na)
CABG 63.9%
Valve 24.1%
CABG+Valve 12%
Guihaire35 - 2017 92
(53/39)
0.7 64.5
(18–83)
CABG 8.6%
Valve 74.1%
Ao Diss. 12.1%
LVAD 3.4%
Others 1.7%
Raffa36 - 2017 86 na 65±11.2
(31–86)
CABG 22%
CABG+Valve 21%
Valve 16%
Ao Diss. 4%
Others 24%
Fux37 – 2018 105
(80/25)
na 62 (median)
(18–77)
CABG 20%
Single, other than -CABG 29%
2 procedures 31%
3 procedures 20%

AA, ascending aorta; Ao Diss, Aortic dissection; AVR, aortic valve replacement; CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; Cong, congenital; ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; HTx, heart transplant; LV, left ventricle; LVAD, left ventricular assist device; MV, mitral valve; MVR, mitral valve replacement; na, not available; PE, pulmonary embolectomy; PEA, pulmonary endo-arterectomy; Valve, valve replacement or repair; VSD: ventricular septal defect;

a

Study included only patients over 70 years of age

b

Study included only extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) after cardiac surgery