Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 May 26.
Published in final edited form as: Annu Rev Law Soc Sci. 2017 Jul 3;13(1):181–202. doi: 10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110615-084851

Table 2.

Peer-reviewed longitudinal analyses of the association between medical marijuana laws and various outcomes

Outcome variable Source Association with medical marijuana
Marijuana prevalence among youth Khatapoush & Hallfors (2004) Not statistically significant
Harper et al. (2012) Negative, but statistical significance depends on specification
Wall et al. (2012) Not statistically significant once Montana or Vermont is dropped
Lynne-Landsman et al. (2013) Not statistically significant
Schuermeyer et al. (2014) Not statistically significant for commercialization on prevalence; marginally significant positive effect on abuse/dependence
Choo et al. (2014) Not statistically significant
Anderson et al. (2015) Not statistically significant
Wen et al. (2015) Positive for initiation for those 12–20; positive for dispensaries and past-month use
Pacula et al. (2015) Not statistically significant for dispensaries, mixed for other aspects of MML
Hasin et al. (2015); Keyes et al. (2016) Negative for eighth-graders; no statistically significant effect for other grades
Martins et al. (2016) Not statistically significant
Stolzenberg et al. (2016) Positive
Wall et al. (2016) Not statistically significant
Johnson et al. (2017) Not statistically significant for MML, but positive with higher possession limits and a voluntary registration
Marijuana prevalence among adults Gorman & Huber (2007) Not statistically significant
Harper et al. (2012) Not statistically significant
Schuermeyer et al. (2014) Not statistically significant
Pacula et al. (2015) Positive association with dispensaries (all ages; no test for adults only)
Wen et al. (2015) Positive for adults 21+
Martins et al. (2016) Positive for adults 26+
Alcohol use Anderson et al. (2013) Negative for adults
Sabia et al. (2015) Negative for binge drinking for adults
Wen et al. (2015) Not statistically significant for those 12–20; positive for frequency of binge drinking among those ages 21+
Opioids Bachhuber et al. (2014) Negative for overdose deaths
Wen et al. (2015) Not statistically significant for prescription painkiller misuse
Bradford & Bradford (2016) Negative for pain medication prescriptions in Medicare D population
Kim et al. (2016) No statistically significant effect for drivers in fatal crashes testing positive for opioids; negative for those aged 21–40
Bradford & Bradford (2017) Negative for pain medication prescriptions among Medicaid enrollees
Suicide rates Anderson et al. (2014) Negative
Rylander et al. (2014) Negative
Grucza et al. (2015) Not statistically significant

Abbreviation: MML, medical marijuana law (dichotomously coded).