Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 16;11(15):3878–3884. doi: 10.1039/d0sc00102c

Optimization of reaction conditionsa.

graphic file with name d0sc00102c-u1.jpg
Entry Solvent Ag salt Temp Product Yield
1 DCEb 70 °Cc 3a 82%d
2 Benzeneb rtc 3a 40%d
3 THFb rtc 3a 47%d
4 EtOHb rtc 3a 55%d
5 CH3CNb rtc 3a 55%d
6 DMFb rtc 3a 54%d
7 DCE AgOTf rte 5a 57%f
8 DCE AgNTf2 rte 5a 66%f
9 DCE AgSbF6 rte 5a 53%f
10 DCE AgBF4 rte 5a 49%f
11 Benzeneg AgNTf2 rte 5a 11%f
12 THFg AgNTf2 rte 5a 27%f
13 EtOHg AgNTf2 rte 5a nd
14 CH3CNg AgNTf2 rte 5a 53%f
15 DMFg AgNTf2 rte 5a nd
16 DMSOg AgNTf2 rte 5a nd
a

Unless specified, all reactions were carried out using 1a (0.5 mmol, 2.5 eq.), 2a (0.2 mmol, 1.0 eq.), CuOAc (30 mol%), Cs2CO3 (50 mol%), AuPPh3Cl (10 mol%), and Ag salt (10 mol%) in a reaction tube in DCE (2 mL) at indicated temperature.

b

The solvent of Castro–Stephens coupling for 3a.

c

Temperature for the first coupling reaction.

d

Isolated yield of 3a.

e

The first coupling step was carried out at 70 °C.

f

Isolated yield of 5a in a purification free manner.

g

After filtration, the filtrate was concentrated and diluted with the indicated solvent (4 mL) for the subsequent operation.