Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 4;2(1):tgaa095. doi: 10.1093/texcom/tgaa095

Table 2.

Model effects for absolute power between the active and sham groups

Absolute power Wald Inline graphic df P Post hoc
Delta
 Group 0.427 1 0.513
 Time 1.616 1 0.204
 Region 307.382*** 8 <0.001 N.S.
 Group × Time 0.001 1 0.979
 Group × Time × Region 13.341 8 0.101
Theta
 Group 0.026 1 0.871
 Time 0.141 1 0.707
 Region 211.825*** 8 <0.001 N.S.
 Group × Time 0.017 1 0.896
 Group × Time × Region 5.949 8 0.653
Alpha
 Group 1.315 1 0.251
 Time 0.217 1 0.641
 Region 64.258*** 8 <0.001 N.S.
 Group × Time 0.364 1 0.546
 Group × Time × Region 10.896 8 0.208
Beta
 Group 0.004 1 0.951
 Time 0.026 1 0.871
 Region 147.764*** 8 <0.001 N.S.
 Group × Time 1.135 1 0.287
 Group × Time × Region 35.919*** 8 <0.001 N.S.
Gamma
 Group 2.427 1 0.119
 Time 0.994 1 0.319
 Region 46.283*** 8 <0.001 N.S.
 Group × Time 0.178 1 0.673
 Group × Time × Region 19.042* 8 0.015 1 m: Left parietal: active < sham

Note: N.S., not significant. The Bonferroni-corrected post hoc comparison was used (P < 0.025).

* P < 0.05.

** P < 0.01.

*** P < 0.001.