Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 4;2(1):tgaa095. doi: 10.1093/texcom/tgaa095

Table 3.

Model effects for intra-hemispheric coherence between the active and sham groups

Intra-hemispheric coherence Wald Inline graphic df P Post hoc
Delta
 Group 21.750*** 1 <0.001 Active < sham
 Time 0.001 1 0.975
 Region 1063.323*** 5 <0.001 N.S.
 Hemisphere 0.034 1 0.854
 Group × Time 2.528 1 0.112
 Group × Time × Region 3.255 5 0.661
 Group × Time × Hemisphere 0.400 1 0.527
 Group × Time × Region × Hemisphere 0.307 5 0.998
Theta
 Group 23.272*** 1 <0.001 Active < sham
 Time 0.022 1 0.881
 Region 1182.045*** 5 <0.001 N.S.
 Hemisphere 0.100 1 0.752
 Group × Time 3.846 1 0.050
 Group × Time × Region 2.585 5 0.764
 Group × Time × Hemisphere 0.916 1 0.339
 Group × Time × Region × Hemisphere 0.673 5 0.984
Alpha
 Group 31.810*** 1 <0.001 Active < sham
 Time 1.051 1 0.305
 Region 827.248*** 5 <0.001 N.S.
 Hemisphere 0.168 1 0.682
 Group × Time 2.021 1 0.155
 Group × Time × Region 0.517 5 0.991
 Group × Time × Hemisphere 0.022 1 0.881
 Group × Time × Region × Hemisphere 0.579 5 0.989
Beta
 Group 20.133*** 1 <0.001 Active < sham
 Time 6.657 1 0.010
 Region 577.022*** 5 <0.001 N.S.
 Hemisphere 1.460 1 0.227
 Group × Time 5.561* 1 0.018 Sham: baseline <1 m
 Group × Time × Region 0.713 5 0.982
 Group × Time × Hemisphere 0.061 1 0.806
 Group × Time × Region × Hemisphere 0.597 5 0.988
Gamma
 Group 14.366*** 1 <0.001 Active < sham
 Time 3.916 1 0.048
 Region 138.671*** 5 <0.001 N.S.
 Hemisphere 0.914 1 0.339
 Group × Time 1.788 1 0.181
 Group × Time × Region 1.172 5 0.948
 Group × Time × Hemisphere 0.141 1 0.708
 Group × Time × Region × Hemisphere 0.165 5 0.999

Note: The Bonferroni-corrected post hoc comparison was used (P < 0.025). N.S., not significant.

* P < 0.05.

*** P < 0.001.