Skip to main content
. 2020 May 21;1(1):tgaa018. doi: 10.1093/texcom/tgaa018

Table 2.

Summary of the analysis regarding differences observed during hibernation of the Syrian hamster concerning basal dendrites

C vs. T(AT8−) C vs. T(AT8+) T(AT8−) vs. (AT8+)
Basal arbor
Whole-cell reconstructions
Intersections Total ns ns ns
Sholl ns ns ns
Nodes Total ns ns ns
Sholl ns 20***, 40 μm 20 μm***; 40 μm*
Endings Total ns ns ns
Sholl ns ns ns
Av. diameter Total ns ** ***
Sholl ns 20–30 μm***; 50–60 μm**; 40 μm* 20–60 μm***; 70 μm*
Length Total ns ns ns
Sholl ns ns ns
Surface area Total ns ns ns
Sholl ns 90 μm* ns
Volume Total ns * ns
Sholl ns 50–70 μm**; 80–100 μm* 50, 70 μm**; 60 μm*
Basal arbor
Segment analysis
Tortuosity Branch O1* ns ns
Terminal O2* ns ns
Av. diameter Branch ns O1**; O2* O1***
Terminal ns ns O2*; O3
Length Branch ns O1***; O3* ns
Terminal ns O2***; O3 O2**; O3***; O4*
Surface area Branch ns O1*** O1***; O2*; O3
Terminal ns O2***; O3 O2**; O3***; O4*
Volume Branch ns O1***; O2* O1***; O2**; O3*
Terminal ns O2***; O3 O2***; O3

* P < 0.05; **P < 0.001; ***P < 0.0001.