Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 24;1(1):tgaa053. doi: 10.1093/texcom/tgaa053

Table 2.

Comparison of SB statistics under GLT-1 specific treatments in disinhibited state of cortical networks

Drug
treatments
Firing rate
(spikes/s)
SB rate
(min−1)
SB duration
(s)
SB index
(0–1)
Ref 
+ Bic 
+ DHK
34 ± 22
82 ± 48**
97 ± 31, n.s
F(2,10) = 21.19***
7 ± 5
7 ± 4, n.s
21 ± 16*
F(2,10) = 10.26**
0.28 ± 0.19
0.85 ± 0.49**
0.58 ± 0.35, n.s
F(2,8) = 12.21**
0.86 ± 0.12
0.99 ± 0.01*
0.99 ± 0.01, n.s
χ2(2,9) = 9.8**
Ref 
+ Bic 
+ GT949
27 ± 17
60 ± 42*
12 ± 08**
F(2,9) = 14.88**
5 ± 2
8 ± 4, n.s
5 ± 3, n.s
F(2,8) = 2.43, n.s
0.35 ± 0.24
0.73 ± 0.42***
0.17 ± 0.05**
F(2,9) = 16.64**
0.84 ± 0.12
0.99 ± 0.01**
0.99 ± 0.02, n.s
χ2(2,8) = 12.67***

Notes: Summary of the changes in array-wide neuronal activities from Ref to pharmacologically disinhibited state (Bic, 10 μM) followed by manipulation of GLT-1 GluTs with DHK (200 μM) or GT949 (10 μM). n.s = not significant.

Statistical tests: repeated measures 1-way ANOVA (F) and nonparametric Friedman test (χ2), significance *P < 0.05.