Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 28;12(20):6772–6799. doi: 10.1039/d1sc01609a

Comparison of structural characteristics in metal–organic frameworks with the highest SO2 capture.

Material MOF-177 MFM-170 MIL-101(Cr)-4F(1%)
Ligand H3BTB H4L = 4′,4′′′-(pyridine-3,5-diyl)bis([1,1′-biphenyl]-3,5-dicarboxylic acid)
H2BDC/H2BDC-4F
SBU [Zn44-O)(O2CR)6] [Cu2(O2CR)4] [Cr33-O)(O2CR)6]
graphic file with name d1sc01609a-u1.jpg graphic file with name d1sc01609a-u2.jpg graphic file with name d1sc01609a-u3.jpg
BET surface area [m2 g−1] 4100 2408 2176
Pore volume [cm3 g−1] 1.51 0.88 1.19
SO2 adsorption [mmol g−1] 25.7 17.5 18.4
Packing density [cm3 g−1] 1.09 1.27 1.00
Stability under SO2 Partial destruction after SO2 exposure Stable after 50 cycles Stable after 50 cycles