Table 5. Results from the analysis of behaviour related to the dog in D and DA visits.

Physical contact to the dog
Period 1		OR	95% CI	P-value
Interaction
GBS * visit type	D	1.2a	0.7–2.0	<0.05
	DA	0.5a	0.3–0.9
Main effects	No. of visits	1.7b	1.1–2.4	<0.01
	Visitorc			<0.05
Period 2
Main effects	GBS	0.7a	0.5–1.0	<0.05
	No. of visit	1.4b	1.0–1.8	<0.05
Period 3
Main effects	No. of visits	1.7b	1.2–2.4	<0.01
Talk directed at the dog
Period 1		OR	95% CI	P-value
Interaction
GBS * visit type	D	0.8a	0.4–1.6	<0.05
	DA	0.2a	0.1–0.6
Main effects	No. of visits	1.6b	1.1–2.3	<0.05
Period 2
Main effects	Speech (normal vs impaired)	9.3	2.5–35.4	0.001
	Handicap (normal vs impaired)	7.7	1.8–33.4	<0.01
Period 3
Interaction
GBS * visit type	D	1.0a	0.5–1.8	<0.05
	DA	0.2a	0.1–0.7
Main effects	No. of visits	2.1b	1.3–3.2	<0.01
	Speech (normal vs impaired)	5.1	1.0–26.2	0.05
Talking about the dog
Period 1		OR	95% CI	P-value
Main effects	Vision (normal vs impaired)	0.3	0.1–0.9	<0.05
	Visitorc			<0.05
Period 2
Main effects	Visit type (D vs DA)	0.4b	0.1–1.0	0.05
	Vision (normal vs impaired)	0.3	0.1–0.9	<0.05
Period 3
Interaction
GBS * visit type	D	1.5a	0.9–2.4	<0.01
	DA	0.5a	0.3–1.0
Main effects	Vision (normal vs impaired)	0.3	0.1–0.9	<0.05

For each of the three periods, the estimated odds ratios (OR), the 95 confidence intervals (95% CI) and the P-values are shown for significant effects. Visits with a dog, no activity (D), Visits with a dog, with activity (DA), The Gottfries-Bråne-Steen Scale (GBS). ^a For an increase of 20 on the GBS scale, ^b For an increase of one visit, ^c Difference between individual visitors not shown.