Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 1;99(5):skab069. doi: 10.1093/jas/skab069

Table 3.

Blood chemistry of ewes

Treatment1 Orthogonal contrast P-value2
Item3 CON− CON+ SWO SWP SE SWO vs. SWP Eff. of extract Eff. of supp.
n 4 3 3 3 3
PU, mmol/L
 Prelambing 8.07 8.14 7.11 7.89 0.50 0.25 0.26 0.50
 4 wk in milk 7.13 6.85 7.04 8.07 0.57 0.17 0.27 0.76
 Weaning 8.49 10.25 11.20 9.71 0.56 0.05 0.75 <0.01
TAS, mmol/L
 Prelambing 1.16 1.10 1.11 1.12 0.03 0.84 0.60 0.22
 4 wk in milk 1.16 1.02 1.12 1.13 0.04 0.91 0.04 0.10
 Weaning 1.14 1.11 1.16 1.14 0.04 0.81 0.45 0.89
GPx, U/mL
 Prelambing 15.25 11.97 13.98 13.49 2.9 0.91 0.62 0.53
 4 wk in milk 14.85 39.35 34.09 29.22 4.0 0.36 0.05 <0.01

Sampling dates occurred prior to lambing (prelambing), after lambing (postlambing), and at weaning.

1Treatments were not supplemented (CON−), a pelleted supplement only (CON+), CON+ with a seaweed extract (SWO), and CON+ with a seaweed plus terrestrial plant extract (SWP).

2Orthogonal contrasts tested were SWO vs. SWP = differences in the extracts used (SWO compared with SWP), eff. of extract (CON+ compared with SWO and SWP), and eff. of supp. = effect of supplements (CON− compared with CON+, SWO, and SWP).

3PU = plasma urea.

4Experimental unit was the replicated pastures.