Table 2.
Effects of dietary supplementation of taurine on meat quality of broiler chickens subjected to H2O2 administration1
Treatments | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Items2 | Control | H2O2 | H2O2 + taurine | P-value |
pH24 h | 6.45 ± 0.05a | 6.15 ± 0.05b | 6.27 ± 0.03ab | <0.01 |
a* | 2.8 ± 0.1 | 2.7 ± 0.1 | 2.7 ± 0.1 | 0.95 |
b* | 17.0 ± 0.4 | 17.2 ± 0.4 | 17.2 ± 0.4 | 0.89 |
L* | 50.4 ± 0.4 | 51.5 ± 0.4 | 50.7 ± 0.6 | 0.26 |
Drip loss, % | 1.50 ± 0.05 | 1.53 ± 0.05 | 1.51 ± 0.03 | 0.70 |
Cooking loss, % | 15.1 ± 0.2 | 15.3 ± 0.3 | 14.9 ± 0.4 | 0.59 |
Shear force value, N | 17.8 ± 0.5c | 20.8 ± 0.4a | 19.0 ± 0.3b | <0.01 |
1Values are means ± SE, n = 8.
2a*, redness; b*, yellowness; L*, lightness; control, broilers fed a basal diet and received no injections; H2O2, birds fed a basal diet and received an intraperitoneal injection of 10% H2O2 on day 9 of the experiment (at 37 d of age), with a dosage of 1.0 mL/kg BW; H2O2 + taurine, birds fed the basal diet supplemented with 5 g/kg taurine and received the same injection as the H2O2 group.
a–cMean values within a row followed by different lowercase superscript letters were significantly different (P < 0.05) between groups.