Skip to main content
. 2021 May 26;7(22):eabf0971. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abf0971

Fig. 5. Strong suppression of protein synthesis by overactivated ISR is beneficial but cannot be sustained in vivo leading to devastating consequences.

Fig. 5

(A and B) The relative protein synthesis rate of animals injected with puromycin at (A) P13 and (B) P17. Bars represent means ± SD (one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparisons test, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001) (n = 4). (C) De novo synthesis in mitochondria isolated from WT, CHOP KO, DARS2 KO, and DKOE and DKOL animals after 1 hour of 35S-methionine pulse labeling followed by SDS-PAGE. Coomassie blue–stained gel was used as a loading control. (D) Blue native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (BN-PAGE) and subsequent Western blot analysis of OXPHOS complexes and supercomplexes in mitochondria isolated from WT, CHOP DO, DARS2 KO, and early (DKOE) and late-stage (DKOL) DKO animals. Subunit-specific antibodies (left) were used to detect respective complexes and supercomplexes (right) (n = 3). (E) Western blot analysis of BIP levels in WT, CHOP KO, DARS2 KO, and DKO at P17 (±2) (top) and WT and DARS2 KO at 6 weeks (bottom) (n = 3). (F) Western blot analysis proteins involved in the Ca2+ metabolism in WT, CHOP KO, DARS2 KO, and DKOL at P17 (±2) (n = 3). (E and F) HSC70 was used as a loading control (n = 3).