Table 1. Literature Review of Experimental Data and Model Verification.

researcher	year	research group and facility	fluid	pipe dia. [in.]	flow regime	main experimental characteristics	model verification with experimental results
Lund19	1998	TUPDP, single-phase loop	South Pelto crude oil	1	laminar, single-phase flow	coupled behavior with the Reynolds number
						the ambient temperature was not maintained constant
						do not resemble field conditions
Matzain15	1999	TUPDP multiphase flow loop	South Pelto crude oil	1	laminar and turbulent, two-phase oil–gas flow	coupled behavior with the Reynolds number	wax deposition prediction dependent on flow pattern
						the ambient temperature was not maintained constant	experimental results are in good agreement with the Matzain model
						do not resemble field conditions
Singh20	2000	University of Michigan, flow loop	model oil	0.5	laminar, single-phase	coupled behavior with the Reynolds number	experimental results are in good agreement with the FMT model
						do not resemble field conditions
Hernandez21	2003	TUPDP, multiphase loop	South Pelto crude oil	1	turbulent, single-phase	do not resemble field conditions	FMT model overpredicts deposition and the EM model underpredicts the deposition process
Venkatesan16	2004	University of Michigan, flow loop	model oil	0.5	turbulent, single-phase	coupled behavior with the Reynolds number	FMT model failed experimental data in good agreement with Venkatesan 2004 model
						do not resemble field conditions
Lee22	2008	University of Michigan, gel-breaking facility	model oil	0.3	laminar, single-phase flow	do not resemble field conditions	new precipitation kinetics model that predicted Venkatesan 2004 and Singh 2000 experimental data were in good agreement
Dwivedi25	2010	TUPDP, small-scale facility	South Pelto crude oil	0.5	turbulent, single-phase flow	do not keep the interface temperature constant	EM model deposition was underpredicted in comparison with experimental data
				1		the data cannot be utilized to investigate scale-up and dominant parameters of wax deposition
				1.5
						interface temperature was not kept constant
						inaccurate measurement technique
						do not resemble field conditions
Karami26	2011	TUPDP, small-scale facility	Garden Banks condensate	0.5	turbulent, single-phase flow	considered constant interface temperature	EM model deposition was overpredicted in comparison with experimental data in some cases while it was underpredicted in some cases
				1		initial Reynolds number and initial shear stress were not considered constant
				1.5
						ambient temperature was not maintained constant
						inaccurate measurement technique
						experimental data obtained by all researchers
						high shear stress and high Reynolds number
						do not resemble field conditions
Panacharoensawad17	2012	TUPDP, mini flow loop	South Pelto crude oil	1	laminar and turbulent, two-phase oil–water flow	do not resemble field conditions	FMT model overpredicts deposition and the EM model underpredicts the deposition process
Singh23,24	2013	TUPDP, mini flow loop	Garden Banks condensate	1	turbulent	do not resemble field conditions	FMT model overpredicts deposition and the EM model underpredicts the deposition process
Rittirong18	2014	TUPDP, multiphase loop	Garden Banks condensate	1	laminar and turbulent multiphase flow	do not resemble field conditions	FMT model overpredicts deposition and the EM model underpredicts the deposition process
Agarwal2	2016	TUPDP, small-scale facility	model oil	0.5	turbulent	closer to field conditions	FMT model overpredicts deposition and the EM model underpredicts the deposition process
				1
				1.5