Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 22;6(17):11740–11749. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.1c01083

Table 1. Optimization of the Reaction Conditionsa.

graphic file with name ao1c01083_0007.jpg

entry Cu catalyst ligand x yield (%)b
1 Cu(OAc)2 none 1.0 68
2 Cu(OAc)2·2H2O none 1.0 69
3 Cu(OTf)2 none 1.0 55
4 CuCl none 1.0 10
5 CuTc none 1.0 16
6 Cu powder none 1.0 <5
7 Cu(CH3CN)4BF4 none 1.0 10
8 Pd(OAc)2 none 1.0 <5
9 Cu(OAc)2·2H2O 2,2′-bpy 1.0 18
10 Cu(OAc)2·2H2O 1,10-phen 1.0 <5
11 Cu(OAc)2·2H2O tpy 1.0 <5
12 Cu(OAc)2·2H2O 4,4′-bpy 1.0 92
13 Cu(OAc)2·2H2O 4,4′-bpy 0.1 45
14 Cu(OAc)2·2H2O 4,4′-bpy 0.3 90
15c Cu(OAc)2·2H2O 4,4′-bpy 0.3 23
16d Cu(OAc)2·2H2O 4,4′-bpy 0.3 0
a

Conditions: substrate 1a (0.3 mmol), Cu catalyst (10 mol %), ligand (10 mol %), B2pin2 (1.0 equiv), MeOH (2.0 mL) under a N2 atmosphere at 60 °C for 18 h.

b

Yields determined by 1H NMR with CH2Br2 as internal standard.

c

EtOH instead of MeOH.

d

H2O instead of MeOH.