Table 2.
Between | Assessmenta | Boys | Girls | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
G | P value | G | P value | ||
Conditional correlationb | |||||
Radius and Olecranon | First | 0.81 | <0.001c | 0.83 | <0.001c |
Second | 0.82 | <0.001c | 0.85 | <0.001c | |
Overall | 0.81 | <0.001c | 0.84 | <0.001c | |
Radius and Digital | First | 0.77 | <0.001c | 0.74 | <0.001c |
Second | 0.74 | <0.001c | 0.79 | <0.001c | |
Overall | 0.76 | <0.001c | 0.76 | <0.001c | |
Ulna and Olecranon | First | 0.78 | <0.001c | 0.82 | <0.001c |
Second | 0.81 | <0.001c | 0.84 | <0.001c | |
Overall | 0.79 | <0.001c | 0.83 | <0.001c | |
Ulna and Digital | First | 0.76 | <0.001c | 0.73 | <0.001c |
Second | 0.76 | <0.001c | 0.77 | <0.001c | |
Overall | 0.75 | <0.001c | 0.74 | <0.001c | |
Olecranon and Digital | First | 0.84 | <0.001c | 0.85 | <0.001c |
Second | 0.79 | <0.001c | 0.87 | <0.001c | |
Overall | 0.81 | <0.001c | 0.86 | <0.001c | |
Correlation according to level of experience for overall (first and second) assessment | |||||
Radius and Olecranon | Beginner | 0.78 | <0.001c | 0.77 | <0.001c |
Intermediate | 0.89 | <0.001c | 0.88 | <0.001c | |
Experienced | 0.76 | <0.001c | 0.88 | <0.001c | |
Radius and Digital | Beginner | 0.64 | <0.001c | 0.62 | <0.001c |
Intermediate | 0.89 | <0.001c | 0.88 | <0.001c | |
Experienced | 0.74 | <0.001c | 0.78 | <0.001c | |
Ulna and Olecranon | Beginner | 0.68 | <0.001c | 0.75 | <0.001c |
Intermediate | 0.89 | <0.001c | 0.87 | <0.001c | |
Experienced | 0.82 | <0.001c | 0.88 | <0.001c | |
Ulna and Digital | Beginner | 0.63 | <0.001c | 0.60 | <0.001c |
Intermediate | 0.85 | <0.001c | 0.84 | <0.001c | |
Experienced | 0.80 | <0.001c | 0.78 | <0.001c | |
Olecranon and Digital | Beginner | 0.74 | <0.001c | 0.77 | <0.001c |
Intermediate | 0.86 | <0.001c | 0.90 | <0.001c | |
Experienced | 0.84 | <0.001c | 0.90 | <0.001c |
G, gamma’s coefficient.
Using Goodman and Kruskal’s gamma with Bonferroni correction.
When experience of the rater was introduced as a control.
Statistical significance at P < 0.05.